How much will net income INCREASE?Can you help?
    chad-70390 - 12/7/2018, 11:18 pm
    My mind starting asking the following question: "Increase in reference to what? A sale?" I then went on to say for a sale Jones would make $6000, and for a lease, Jones would make $9070 for the year (6000+3070). Therefore the Net Income would CHANGE (comparing the sales vs the lease) $3070. Because the answer didn't exist, I chose $9070, but I believe this question should be re-worded.
    warranty expenseCan you help?
    LUZ-80714 - 12/7/2018, 3:09 am
    I don't think this question is worded correctly. It says the warranty is for 12 months, then the answer covers 2 years
    user-7802 - 12/4/2018, 8:55 pm
    i'm not really sure why tolerable exception rate is inversely related to sample size.. Lets say for example: Population of 100 invoices A) Our tolerable exception rate is 5%. The max amount of misstatements we can accept wile providing an unmodified opinon is 5 B) Our tolerable exception rate is 2%. The max misstatements we'll accept is 2. Since our tolerable exception rate decreased, shouldn't our sample size? It would make more sense to test less things when accepting less misstatements.. Or it would have no effect Anyone want to help me out on what I am missing here... Thanks!
    Need Clarification.
    user-506 - 12/4/2018, 8:20 pm
    The question asks: Which of the statements is true in preparing financial statements for the fund-based statements. The correct answer is slightly confusing. The 100,000 expenditure for supplies under "Purchase method" is accounted for on the date of purchase. When preparing fund-statements for the end of a period there is NO entry for Expenditures. The correct answer says 100,000. That is not clearly distinguished in the question. You still can get the answer because no other answer makes any sense. FYI: for anyone that stumbles on this one.
    Equal Payment times Ordinary annuity
    user-7819 - 12/1/2018, 2:28 pm
    Why we didn't multiple the 40,000 with the Ordinary annuity for 8%, as long as the payments are equal and the reasonable rate is 8% which means the Note will have a discount.
    user-7802 - 12/1/2018, 4:02 am
    hows this make sense mang? i heard that its usually the contrary...........Worse Controls = More extenet of testing....This says the opposite
    Andrew-93160 - 11/28/2018, 3:08 am
    I am starting to go back for my certificate in accounting, can anyone give me ideas / tips for how to review to pass the CPA
    CMACan you help?
    Yousuf-60192 - 11/27/2018, 11:39 am
    Is there any website like this for CMA exam.
    Prospective Financial Statements
    Dana_W - 11/25/2018, 6:17 pm
    Gleim says "a review or a compilation is not permitted" for prospective financial statements (forecasts, projections). Does this questions present a scenario that would/should never occur?
    Why Guaranteed payments has not been reduced out of ordinary inome?
    Sumit-Arora-22325 - 11/22/2018, 7:33 pm
    MY query is the Guaranteed payments are salaries to the partner and deducted from the partnership ordinary income and therefore Partnership Ordinary Income should by 200000-60000=140000 Further, Charitable contributions are shown as a separate stated items on the Schedule k-1 and therefore should not be include in the ordinary income. Therefore partners share of income should be (140000*40%)+(60000)=56000+60000= 116,000
    Posts per Page 10 20 30 50